Recently, the Bombay High Court in Shankar Bhimrao Kadam & Ors. vs. Tata Motors Limited W.P.No. 5588/2017 while hearing the batch of petitions wherein one of the common question was whether the employer indulged in unfair labour practice by engaging the workers on temporary basis for core manufacturing activity. The Court while ruling in favour of the workers observed that the employer has systematically prevented the workers (hired on temporary basis for 7 months) from completing240 days in continuous employment and had foisted involuntary unemployment on these temporaries before they could complete240 days only to paint an imperfect picture that the work had come to an end and, therefore, these temporaries were disengaged by efflux of time, which is an exception to retrenchment under section 2(oo)(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
News Section
Termination after 238 days to avoid permanency is unfair labour practice: Bombay HC
March 17, 2022
You may also like
News Section
Workman Is Not Eligible For Payment Of Gratuity If He Has Questioned Order Of Dismissal From Service: Karnataka HC
January 2, 2024
January 17, 2023
February 27, 2023
Author
April 2024
Cover Story
Notifications
- Central Minimum Wage Revision wed 01 April 2024
- Haryana Declares Paid Holiday for Lok Sabha Elections
- Election Commission Notification: Declaration for Paid Holiday for Lok Sabha Elections 2024
- List of districts where ESI is applicable
- Raj. Govt. Notification dated 7.3.24 for allowing women working in night shift with consent
- UP State Conditions for Women Employment in Night Notification
- M.P. Revised Minimum Wages
- Uttarakhand Minimum Wages 2024
Add comment