Supreme Court in Shri M.L. Patil (Dead) Through LRs vs. the State of Goa and Anr. C.A. No. 4100/2022, while hearing an appeal assailing on the decision of the Bombay High Court which denied the back wages for the period of two extra years of work and arrears of pension to employees on the ground that the employees ought to have been superannuated/retired at the age of 60 (sixty) years instead of 58 (fifty eight) years, observed that although the High Court may be right and/or justified in denying any salary for the period of two extra years to the employees if they would have continued in service, on the ground of delay, however, as far as the pension is concerned, it is a continuous cause of action, there is no justification at all for denying the arrears of pension.


You may also like
June 28, 2022
November 12, 2022
October 4, 2022
Author
December 2023

Cover Story
Notifications
- FAQs on SOP for PF inspections
- EPFO circular about transfer of accounts after member death
- Rights of Persons with Disabilities Amendment Rules 2023
- P&H HC Judgment Scrapping Haryana Private Job Reservation Act
- SEZ Amendment Rules 2023. Reg. Work From Home
- EPFO guidelines for 7A inquiry
- Delhi Minimum Wages w.e.f. 01-10-2023
- The Uttarakhand Minimum Wages Notification, October-2023
Add comment