Supreme Court in Shri M.L. Patil (Dead) Through LRs vs. the State of Goa and Anr. C.A. No. 4100/2022, while hearing an appeal assailing on the decision of the Bombay High Court which denied the back wages for the period of two extra years of work and arrears of pension to employees on the ground that the employees ought to have been superannuated/retired at the age of 60 (sixty) years instead of 58 (fifty eight) years, observed that although the High Court may be right and/or justified in denying any salary for the period of two extra years to the employees if they would have continued in service, on the ground of delay, however, as far as the pension is concerned, it is a continuous cause of action, there is no justification at all for denying the arrears of pension.
You may also like
February 18, 2023
February 28, 2023
News Section
Madras HC declines to set aside 6 months conviction of Jayaprada for not paying ESI contributions
October 20, 2023
Author
September 2024
Cover Story
Notifications
- UP Govt. Guidelines for Women Safety
- Government of Punjab Extends 24/7 Exemption in Shops and Establishment
- Maharashtra Revises Minimum Wages for July 2024
- ESIC Applicability Criteria 08.07.2022
- Revised Minimum Wages of Punjab w.e.f. 01.03.2024
- EPFO Circular about Contribution under Section 6 not payable on Cost to Company (CTC)
- The Bonus Act Amendment is Upheld by the Division Bench of High Court of Madras
- Exemption for Employment of Women During Night Shift in Rajasthan
Add comment