Madras HC in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation vs. Colorplus Fashions Ltd. and Ors. W.P. No. 18104/2012, while holding that the attendance bonus would qualify as ‘bonus’ for the purpose of exclusion from Section 2(b)(ii) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPF Act“) observed that ‘attendance bonus’ is an inducement amount paid to the employees who reported to the work regularly without absenting themselves and without availing any leave and if an employee failed to turn up for the required number of days, and thus the nature of ‘attendance bonus’ is (a) found to be variable; (b) not common; (c) not granted by all industrial concerns and (d) not paid to all employees within an industrial concern.
You may also like
Author
September 2024
Cover Story
Notifications
- UP Govt. Guidelines for Women Safety
- Government of Punjab Extends 24/7 Exemption in Shops and Establishment
- Maharashtra Revises Minimum Wages for July 2024
- ESIC Applicability Criteria 08.07.2022
- Revised Minimum Wages of Punjab w.e.f. 01.03.2024
- EPFO Circular about Contribution under Section 6 not payable on Cost to Company (CTC)
- The Bonus Act Amendment is Upheld by the Division Bench of High Court of Madras
- Exemption for Employment of Women During Night Shift in Rajasthan
Add comment