More than half of Indian boards surveyed yet to identify successors for top leadership positions: Study by Korn Ferry with NSE
Korn Ferry in partnership with NSE organized a discussion with eminent experts on board practices in Indian companies during an event on 17th December. The discussion was held in the backdrop of launch of a recent study by Korn Ferry titled 'Boards That Lead'.
For this study, the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE)
facilitated Korn Ferry India in conducting an online survey related to the practices followed by the Boards of NSE listed companies in two speci?c governance-related matters-CEO succession planning and Selection of Independent Directors, under the overarching theme of ways to improve board effectiveness. This?rst-of-a-kind survey in which all NSE listed companies were invited to participate, and the one-on-one interviews with select companies that followed the survey, formed the basis for this study report.
Mr. Robert Hallagan, Vice Chairman, Co-leader, Board Services, Korn Ferry said, "India's growth story is inspiring. To continue to flourish, corporate governance standards must keep in step. 'Boards that Lead' is not just a survey, through this we are attempting to start an engaged discussion and 'call to action' to develop governance principles and practices in India that are respected around the world."
Speaking about the study, Mr. Vikram Limaye, MD & CEO, NSE, said, "NSE is focused on enhancing governance standards in listed companies. This study, in partnership with Korn Ferry, is another step in this direction and it allowed us to take stock of some of the prevalent practices of Indian boards that have an impact on board effectiveness."
Navnit Singh, Chairman & Regional Managing Director, Korn Ferry India, explained, "A well-governed board has a strong positive influence on an organization's performance and value creation for employees, clients as well as other stakeholders. The study reflects that boards need to spend more time on CEO succession as this is crucial to the well-being of the organisation and an area for which the board has the ultimate responsibility."
Key findings of the study : Succession Planning
It was found that more than half (56%) of participating company boards had not yet identified successors for top leadership positions. Several company boards did not have a comprehensive and rigorous succession process, timely assessment and review for the CEO role, and other critical leadership positions.
Company size seemed to have bearing on how rigorously the practices were followed. Small cap companies lagged mid and large cap companies in succession planning. Only 32% of small cap firms reported having identified successors for their top leadership positions as compared to 57% for mid caps and 51 % for large caps.
Selection of Independent Directors
Among all sectors, Technology and Industrial sectors reported the lowest adoption rate for effective board practices in selection of IDs, particularly in terms of clearly articulating and communicating the roles of IDs to the prospective candidates at the time of on boarding. These companies also reported lowest figures on the evaluation of IDs for their ability to provide independent judgement. The presence of private equity in the Technology sector poses unique challenges for the companies, such as pressure on short term goals and intense focus on scaling up, sometimes at the cost of long-term sustainability.
Despite several challenges relating to achieving appropriate board composition, including fulfilling the legal mandate to have women directors, several Indian companies have invested time, money and efforts to put in place appropriate processes for the selection of independent directors Toward this end, they adopt an unbiased, scientific approach to selection by casting a wide net through internal referrals, search ?rms and industry networks. Not surprisingly, they are seeing value in their investment.
Improving the effectiveness of the board
Board effectiveness is an evolving process. A formal and regular evaluation is a key instrument in maintaining and raising board effectiveness. While several companies (73% of sample size) reported on having a process for evaluation of the board, only 53% set objectives to measure board performance at the end of the year. In terms of ensuring legal, regulatory, ?nancial, and ethical compliances, which is considered a key metric in assessing board effectiveness, almost 96% of participating company boards reported being highly involved.